Who should CFBRs be submitted to?

Study for the Navy 3-M 302 Repair Parts Petty Officer (RPPO) Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Who should CFBRs be submitted to?

Explanation:
The submission of Configuration Change and Feedback Reports (CFBRs) is the responsibility of ensuring that all feedback regarding equipment and system performance is directed properly for assessment and action. In the context of Navy operations, the 3M Coordinator (3MC) plays a critical role in the Maintenance and Material Management (3M) system by overseeing the effectiveness of maintenance practices and ensuring compliance with standards. Submitting CFBRs to the 3MC is essential because they are responsible for analyzing this data and facilitating the necessary changes or improvements based on that feedback. The 3MC also coordinates communication between various components of the ship's operations, which includes collecting, reviewing, and forwarding these reports to the appropriate authorities for further action. In contrast, while the Commanding Officer (CO) may be involved in broader decision-making processes, they are not typically the first point of contact for operational reports like CFBRs. The Logistics Officer and Supply Officer may handle different aspects of supply chain management and logistics support but do not primarily focus on evaluating maintenance feedback in the same way that the 3MC does. Thus, forwarding CFBRs directly to the 3MC ensures that they reach the right individual who is tasked with maintaining and enhancing the operational readiness of the vessel

The submission of Configuration Change and Feedback Reports (CFBRs) is the responsibility of ensuring that all feedback regarding equipment and system performance is directed properly for assessment and action. In the context of Navy operations, the 3M Coordinator (3MC) plays a critical role in the Maintenance and Material Management (3M) system by overseeing the effectiveness of maintenance practices and ensuring compliance with standards.

Submitting CFBRs to the 3MC is essential because they are responsible for analyzing this data and facilitating the necessary changes or improvements based on that feedback. The 3MC also coordinates communication between various components of the ship's operations, which includes collecting, reviewing, and forwarding these reports to the appropriate authorities for further action.

In contrast, while the Commanding Officer (CO) may be involved in broader decision-making processes, they are not typically the first point of contact for operational reports like CFBRs. The Logistics Officer and Supply Officer may handle different aspects of supply chain management and logistics support but do not primarily focus on evaluating maintenance feedback in the same way that the 3MC does. Thus, forwarding CFBRs directly to the 3MC ensures that they reach the right individual who is tasked with maintaining and enhancing the operational readiness of the vessel

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy